Case 6032114/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Owen Fegan v HBOS plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 6032114/2025
- Decision date
- 2 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Owen Fegan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal decided that Mr Fegan was not disabled at the relevant times for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, his complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed.
The judgment did not determine the unfair dismissal complaint. It stated that the unfair dismissal complaint would continue to the final hearing due to commence on 29 June 2026.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was not disabled at the relevant times for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, so the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was not determined in this judgment and was stated to continue to the final hearing due to commence on 29 June 2026. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.