Case 6032367/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Begum v MV Essentials Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6032367/2025
- Decision date
- 19 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Begum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found Ms T Begum's claim for a statutory redundancy payment against MV Essentials Limited well founded and ordered payment of £1,560. It also found her claim for unpaid wages in the form of holiday pay well founded and awarded £405.60.
The notice pay claim was well founded, with a further award of £2,253.33. The three awards sum to £4,218.93, and the tribunal stated that all were calculated on a gross basis. Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing on 19 June 2026.
The accompanying interest notice identifies 5 August 2026 as the relevant decision day and 6 August 2026 as the calculation day, with interest at 8% per annum. It states that no interest is payable if the award is paid in full within 14 days after the written decision was sent to the parties. No monetary amount of interest is specified.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment; award calculated on a gross basis. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
| Holiday pay | Described as unpaid wages in the form of holiday pay; award calculated on a gross basis. | Upheld | — | £406 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay; award calculated on a gross basis. | Upheld | — | £2,253 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,219
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.