Case 6033270/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Williams v FLD Parcel Network Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6033270/2025
- Decision date
- 11 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge MJ Reed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge MJ Reed, sitting alone at London South by video on 11 February 2026, heard the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against FLD Parcel Network Ltd. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found the complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in respect of work done on 31 July and 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 August 2025.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,400, being the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance. Reasons were given orally; written reasons will only follow if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded in respect of work done on 31 July and 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 August 2025. Respondent did not attend. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.