Case 6033315/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Ms Grazia Saciotti v Hooky St Coffee Co Limited — 2026

Case reference: 6033315/2025
Decision date: 24 June 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Beyzade On

Indexed: 20 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms Grazia Saciotti

Respondent

Hooky St Coffee Co Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal proceeded in Hooky St Coffee Co Limited's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after considering the case file, the available information and the practicable enquiries concerning the respondent's absence. Ms Grazia Saciotti's unauthorised-deduction complaint concerning wage arrears from 31 May 2025 to 9 September 2025 succeeded, with £3,109.93 awarded. Her breach-of-contract complaint for notice pay also succeeded, with £2,946 awarded. Both sums were stated to be subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance on the conditions specified in the judgment.

The complaint that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, contrary to s 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and s 38 of the Employment Act 2002, succeeded and attracted an award of £2,455. The three awards total £8,510.93. The complaints concerning failure to issue a Form P45 were withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 51. The unfair dismissal (constructive) complaint was dismissed because the claimant had not completed the two years' continuous employment required by s 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal found that she had no title to present that complaint and that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Wage arrears for the period from 31 May 2025 to 9 September 2025.	Upheld	—	£3,110
Breach of contract	Notice pay.	Upheld	—	£2,946
Other	Failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment, contrary to s 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and s 38 of the Employment Act 2002.	Upheld	—	£2,455
Other	Complaints concerning failure to issue a Form P45 were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.	Withdrawn	—	—
Constructive dismissal	Described in the judgment as an unfair dismissal (constructive) complaint. The claimant lacked the continuous employment required by s 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it.	Dismissed	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £8,511; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.