Case 6033354/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Pain v LA’s Community Care Ltd Heard at Leeds by CVP — 2026
- Case reference
- 6033354/2025
- Decision date
- 17 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Pain
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shulman heard this case at Leeds by CVP. The respondent did not appear, was not represented and did not file a Response. The tribunal found that on 28 February 2025 the respondent ceased operations and the claimant was made redundant. The claimant had three years of service at a weekly wage of £470.63 gross. She was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,411.89 (3 weeks at £470.63), three weeks' notice pay (£1,411.89), and £2,255.94 in unauthorised deduction of wages for unpaid February 2025 wages (£1,313.93) and part of March 2025 (£942.01). The grand total was £5,079.72 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £1,411.89 (3 years service x £470.63 weekly gross x multiplier 1). | Upheld | — | £1,412 |
| Breach of contract | Three weeks' notice pay at £470.63 weekly gross. | Upheld | — | £1,412 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages: £1,313.93 for February 2025 plus £942.01 for part of March 2025. | Upheld | — | £2,256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,080
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.