Case 6033583/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Huang v Vesynta Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6033583/2025
- Decision date
- 12 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Huang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, Employment Judge Ramsden recorded that the respondent Vesynta Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in June 2025 in the sum of GBP 3,087.79. The respondent had partially corrected that deduction by a payment of GBP 2,458.79 to the claimant on 28 January 2026.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the balancing sum of GBP 629 net. The judgment also recorded that the claimant must account to HMRC for any income tax and employee's National Insurance contributions due on sums paid under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent. Unauthorised deduction of GBP 3087.79 made in June 2025; respondent had already partially repaid GBP 2458.79 on 28 January 2026; tribunal ordered the balancing sum of GBP 629 net. | Upheld | — | £629 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £629
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.