Case 6034070/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Lanre Tajudeen Asuni v Yellow Brick Capital (UK) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6034070/2025
- Decision date
- 14 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lanre Tajudeen Asuni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningLanre Tajudeen Asuni presented the claim against Yellow Brick Capital (UK) Limited on 15 September 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. A Legal Officer decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £312 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,080 in damages. The respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £780 gross. The total award was £3,172.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £2,080 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £780 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,172
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.