Case 6034082/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The SOS for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy and Simply Colors Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6034082/2025
- Decision date
- 5 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Southampton by CVP on 5 March 2026. The claimant appeared in person, the first respondent was represented by a lay representative, and the second respondent did not appear.
The judgment records that the claimant was not an employee of the second respondent. It also records that the claimant was not entitled to the sums she had claimed from the National Insurance Fund. Oral reasons were provided at the hearing, with written reasons available only if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment states that the claimant was not entitled to the sums claimed from the National Insurance Fund; it does not give a separate contractual sum or detailed reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The short judgment states that the claimant was not entitled to the sums claimed from the National Insurance Fund; it does not give a separate redundancy payment figure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment states that the claimant was not entitled to the sums claimed from the National Insurance Fund; it does not give a separate wages figure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment states that the claimant was not entitled to the sums claimed from the National Insurance Fund; it does not give a separate Working Time Regulations figure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.