Case 6034222/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Armour v Joint Pub Ventures Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6034222/2025
- Decision date
- 1 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Armour
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 16 September 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £388.50 gross for that claim. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £845.00.
The judgment records a total sum payable of £1,233.50. No separate award for interest or other heads of loss is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £388.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £389 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £845.00. | Upheld | — | £845 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,234
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.