Case 6034273/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Flanagan v Teixera Associate Services Limited trading as The York Dental Suite — 2026
- Case reference
- 6034273/2025
- Decision date
- 25 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Edwards Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Flanagan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Edwards heard the case at Leeds (by video) on 25 February 2026. The claimant, Mrs B Flanagan, appeared in person; the respondent, Teixera Associate Services Limited trading as The York Dental Suite, was represented by Mr B Hendley (Consultant).
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded, holding that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages on 5 August 2025.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £530.97, being the gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded; deduction made on 5 August 2025. Award is the gross sum deducted; claimant responsible for any tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £531 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £531
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.