Case 6034822/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Sanda Preduna v Grovereeve Knightsbridge Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6034822/2025
- Decision date
- 15 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sanda Preduna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld Sanda Preduna's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that Grovereeve Knightsbridge Limited made an unauthorised deduction during the period from 1 July 2025 to 13 July 2025 and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £569.60.
The Tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for holiday accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended. It awarded £560 for this claim, producing a total amount payable of £1,129.60. The claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on the awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 July 2025 to 13 July 2025. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for accrued but untaken holiday when the claimant's employment ended. | Upheld | — | £560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,130
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.