Case 6034896/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Microland Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6034896/2025
- Decision date
- 5 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Microland Limited, was validly served but did not present a response and did not attend. The Employment Judge therefore entered judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2022 on the papers.
The tribunal found that the claimant, Mr A McGregor, was unfairly dismissed on 17 September 2025. It recorded that he had 27 years of continuous service and was aged 53 at the time of dismissal.
The judgment states that the claimant had already been paid money in respect of a basic award. The remaining compensation awarded was broken down as £6,984.50 for past losses, £18,200 for future losses, and £1,000 for loss of statutory rights, making a total award of £26,184.50.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 17 September 2025. It recorded that the claimant had 27 years of continuous service and was aged 53. The claimant had already been paid money in respect of a basic award, so the ordered sum covered past losses, future losses, and loss of statutory rights only. | Upheld | — | £26,185 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,185
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £26,185
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.