Case 6035057/2025 · Employment Tribunal
B Donoghue v Printstat Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6035057/2025
- Decision date
- 20 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Donoghue
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningB Donoghue presented the claim in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 23 September 2025. Printstat Ltd failed to present a valid response on time. Regional Employment Judge Franey decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal held that Donoghue was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,131 under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered Printstat Ltd to pay £4,131 in total.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 28 July 2026. The accompanying interest notice specified a rate of 8% per annum and a calculation day of 29 July 2026. It stated that no interest would be payable if the sum was paid in full within 14 days after the judgment was sent. No monetary amount of interest was specified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,131 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,131
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.