Case 6035469/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Davina Bennett v Rainbow on the Hill Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6035469/2025
- Decision date
- 24 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Davina Bennett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge G. King, sitting alone at London South Employment Tribunal via CVP on 24 February 2026, heard the claimant Davina Bennett's claim against Rainbow on the Hill Ltd in respect of unpaid wages. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent did not attend.
The Tribunal found that the claim in respect of unpaid wages was well-founded and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £2,943.36, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard 14-day procedure noted in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Sum of £2,943.36 ordered subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. Respondent did not attend. | Upheld | — | £2,943 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,943
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.