Case 6035473/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Dunn v Williams & Spenceley Limited Heard By: Newcastle Employment Tribunal By: Cloud Video Platform (CVP) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6035473/2025
- Decision date
- 11 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Dunn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Martin, sitting at Newcastle Employment Tribunal by CVP on 11 February 2026, heard the claimant's complaints in the absence of the respondent, which neither attended nor was represented. The claimant appeared in person. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and the parties were told they could apply for written reasons within 14 days.
The tribunal found all four of the claimant's complaints well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £195.36 gross for unlawful deduction from wages, £256.41 gross for breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in respect of holiday pay, £910 net for breach of contract relating to notice pay, and £3,150 as a redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded £195.36 gross; rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £195 |
| Holiday pay | Breach of Working Time Regulations 1998 (holiday pay); awarded £256.41 gross, rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £256 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay; awarded £910 net. | Upheld | — | £910 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £3,150. | Upheld | — | £3,150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,511
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.