Case 6035687/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E. Sawa v Greggs plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 6035687/2025
- Decision date
- 19 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R.Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E. Sawa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 19 December 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not reply or request a hearing. Employment Judge T.R.Smith was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3, because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under Rule 38 because it had no reasonable prospect of success and because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.