Case 6035890/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Girardier v Jelly Rolls Limited (in liquidation) and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6035890/2025
- Decision date
- 17 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Midlands East
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms H Girardier
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms H Girardier was not an employee at the material times for the purposes of claims from the National Insurance fund. Her claims for redundancy pay, arrears of pay and holiday pay against Jelly Rolls Limited (in liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade therefore failed and were dismissed.
Employment Judge Brewer gave judgment following the hearing on 17 July 2026. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment records the employee-status finding without further factual reasoning. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant was not an employee at the material times for the purposes of claims from the National Insurance fund. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Arrears of pay claimed from the National Insurance fund. Classified as other because the judgment does not identify an unlawful deduction from wages claim. Dismissed because the claimant was not an employee for these purposes at the material times. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant was not an employee at the material times for the purposes of claims from the National Insurance fund. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.