Mr J Cooper v Covers 33 Limited — 2026

Case reference: 6036096/2025
Decision date: 10 June 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Edwards Representation

Indexed: 11 July 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Cooper

Respondent

Covers 33 Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr J Cooper brought a complaint against Covers 33 Limited described in the judgment as constructive unfair dismissal. The case was heard at Leeds by video on 9 and 10 June 2026 before Employment Judge S Edwards, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms R Thompson, identified as the respondent director's daughter.

The tribunal's recorded judgment states that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. The written record does not set out findings of fact, legal reasoning, or any remedy award. It records that summary reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written summary reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment records that the complaint was one of constructive unfair dismissal and that it was not well founded and dismissed. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.