Case 6036172/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Anna Smith v Edu-action Bristol Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6036172/2025
- Decision date
- 20 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anna Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Anna Smith's unfair dismissal complaint against Edu-action Bristol Ltd because she did not have two years' service. Employment Judge Lumby found that the grounds for striking out that complaint under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal had written to Smith on 19 November 2025, warning of the proposed strike-out and giving her an opportunity to explain why the complaint should continue or to request a hearing. She did not reply. The judge found that striking out the complaint accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The rest of the claim was unaffected by the judgment. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The rest of the claim was not affected by this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: no reasonable prospect of success
- Rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.