Case 6036463/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kaltzidis v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6036463/2025
- Decision date
- 26 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kaltzidis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied for interim relief in relation to a complaint concerning dismissal. The Tribunal considered whether it was likely that, when the complaint was determined, it would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was the reason specified in section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal concluded that this likelihood threshold was not met. The application for interim relief was therefore refused. The judgment does not determine the final outcome of the underlying complaint or make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment determined only an application for interim relief. The application was refused because the Tribunal did not consider it likely that, on determining the complaint, it would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was that specified in section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. The underlying complaint was not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.