Case 6036476/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Gaia Enria v BURRO E SALVIA Ltd (In liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6036476/2025
- Decision date
- 1 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gaia Enria
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that BURRO E SALVIA LTD had made unauthorised deductions from Gaia Enria’s wages and ordered payment of £1,260. It also found that Enria was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,764.22.
The tribunal found that Enria was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,910.40. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,110.62. The total award was £12,045.24.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
| Breach of contract | Damages concerned dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,764 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,910 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,111 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,045
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.