Case 6036717/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Dallimore v Conti Fish Bar (UK) Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6036717/2025
- Decision date
- 15 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Dallimore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, Employment Judge C Sharp (sitting alone) at Cardiff by CVP on 15 January 2026 issued judgment in this case brought by Ms B Dallimore against Conti Fish Bar (UK) Ltd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its owner, Mr I Okutucu, with a Turkish-language interpreter present.
The tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay was well-founded, with the respondent agreeing to pay £850 gross to the claimant and the claimant agreeing to accept that sum. The judgment notes the claimant is responsible for any tax or statutory deductions due on the award. The claimant withdrew her separate claim concerning failure to provide a statement of employment particulars, and that claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Judgment issued by consent. Respondent agreed to pay £850 gross in respect of unpaid accrued holiday pay; claimant agreed to accept. Claimant responsible for any tax or statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £850 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars (s.1 ERA 1996 type complaint) was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal. No specific claim_type in the §4.4 taxonomy fits a written-particulars claim, so classified as 'other'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £850
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.