Case 6036880/2025 · Employment Tribunal
M Farooq v Fast Despatch Logistics Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6036880/2025
- Decision date
- 14 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Farooq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningM Farooq presented the claim on 7 October 2025. Fast Despatch Logistics Limited did not present a valid response on time. Legal Officer Sheard decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim could properly be determined.
The Legal Officer found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The sum due was £480 for four training days at £120 per day and £2,775 for 15 delivery days at £185 per day, less £450 in agreed deductions for two weeks of insurance and van hire. The respondent was ordered to pay £2,805 gross in total.
The written judgment was sent to the parties on 7 August 2026. The accompanying notice stated that no interest would be payable if the award were paid in full within 14 days; otherwise, interest would accrue at 8% per year from 8 August 2026. No fixed interest sum was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated as £2,805 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,805 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,805
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.