Case 6036897/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Weaver v Trelya — 2025
- Case reference
- 6036897/2025
- Decision date
- 4 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Weaver
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant applied for interim relief in a claim that included complaints of disability discrimination and dismissal and detriment on the grounds of public interest disclosure. The tribunal considered the application under ss. 128 and 129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and applied the higher interim relief likelihood threshold.
The tribunal accepted that the application required only an expeditious summary assessment, largely on the claim documents and submissions. It concluded that, on the material before it, it did not appear likely that causation and dismissal would be determined in the Claimant's favour, while noting that this did not mean the claim was weak or doomed to failure.
The interim relief application was dismissed. The tribunal recorded that the response had been provided but not processed, and that the parties would receive notice of a Case Management Preliminary Hearing in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's application for interim relief under ss. 128 and 129 Employment Rights Act 1996. This was not a final determination of the underlying whistleblowing or discrimination complaints, and a Case Management Preliminary Hearing was to follow. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
28 references- ss. 128 and 129 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s. 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- Taplin v C Shippham Ltd
- Dandpat v University of Bath
- London City Airport v Chacko
- Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz
- Wollenberg v Global Gaming
- expeditious summary assessment
- rule 94
- His Highness Shake Bin Sadr al Qasimi v Robinson
- Simply Smile Manor House Ltd v Ter-Berg
- Williams v Michelle Brown
- s. 43B Employment Rights Act 1996
- Geduld v Cavendish-Munro
- Kilraine v Wandsworth BC
- Simpson v Cantor Fitzgerald
- Western Union v Anastasiou
- Twist DX v Armes
- Babula v Waltham Forest College
- Korashi v Abertawe University Local Health Board
- Kraus v Penna
- Ibrahim v HCA
- Chesterton v Normohamed
- Parsons v Airplus International Ltd
- Smith v Hayle Town Council
- Tedeschi v Hosiden Besson Ltd
- Kuzel v Roche
- Ross v Eddie Stobart
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.