Case 6037134/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Brabon v RJT Window and Exterior Cleaning Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6037134/2025
- Decision date
- 31 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Perry Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Brabon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Brabon started work for RJT Window and Exterior Cleaning Limited in April 2023 as Operations Manager. The Tribunal found that discussions before he started referred to a bonus calculated by reference to gross profit, but the written contract signed on 4 April 2023 was the first and final legally binding agreement on bonus. Clause 9.1.1 and Annex C described a profit-related bonus scheme and stated that the details could be amended or withdrawn at any time.
The Tribunal accepted that the Respondent had genuine concerns about cash flow and the business position, and that those matters were among the factors taken into account when the directors decided in June 2025 not to pay a bonus for 2024-2025. It held that the contractual discretion to amend or withdraw the bonus scheme was not limited to future years. The Claimant's argument that the Respondent could only change the scheme prospectively, and not remove entitlement for the latest year, was rejected.
Applying the contractual discretion principles discussed in the judgment, including the need to avoid irrational or perverse exercise of discretion and to take account of relevant factors, the Tribunal found the decision not to award a bonus was not irrational or perverse and did not involve reliance on irrelevant considerations. It therefore held that there had been no breach of contract. Because there was no legal entitlement to a bonus, the unlawful deduction from wages claim also failed and both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned the Respondent's decision not to pay a bonus for the 2024-2025 year. The Tribunal held there was no legal entitlement to the bonus and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found the written contract signed on 4 April 2023 was the binding agreement, that the bonus clause gave the Respondent a contractual discretion to amend or withdraw the scheme, and that the decision not to award the bonus was not irrational, perverse, or based on irrelevant factors. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd v Attrill
- Clark v Nomura International plc
- IBM UK Holdings Ltd v Dalgleish
- irrationality or perversity
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.