Case 6037599/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Orosz v Matthews International Transport Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6037599/2025
- Decision date
- 12 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Orosz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 12 October 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The unfair dismissal complaint succeeds. The remedy to which the claimant is entitled was not determined in this judgment and will be decided at a Final Hearing.
The judgment did not make a final determination of the disability discrimination complaint. That complaint will also be considered at the Final Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint succeeds, with remedy to be determined at a Final Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that it is not possible to make a final determination of the disability discrimination complaint and that it will be considered at the Final Hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.