Case 6037739/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sandra Martin v Custom Pharmaceuticals Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6037739/2025
- Decision date
- 21 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sandra Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Sandra Martin brought a single complaint of unfair dismissal. Her case was that she submitted a resignation letter on 29 July 2025, then emailed her manager and the HR Department two days later to withdraw it, but the respondent did not allow her to withdraw the resignation and her employment ended. She said the resignation was made when she was under significant emotional pressure and in poor health. The respondent disputed that it was obliged to accept the withdrawal and applied to strike out the claim for having no reasonable prospects of success.
The tribunal noted the orthodox position that unambiguous words of resignation will normally end the contract of employment and that an employer is generally under no obligation to allow withdrawal. It referred to Sovereign House Security Services Ltd v Savage and Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd v Lineham as the authorities on the possibility of special circumstances where a tribunal may find that there was in fact no resignation despite appearances to the contrary. The tribunal also recorded that there was no suggestion of an alternative constructive dismissal case.
The judge was not satisfied that the papers established there were no special circumstances in this case. That issue needed to be explored at a hearing rather than decided on the application. Given the relatively high threshold for striking out a claim on the papers and the desirability of a public hearing, the application to strike out was refused. The judgment did not determine liability on the unfair dismissal claim and made no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | This was a strike-out application, not a merits determination. The tribunal refused the respondent's application under Rule 38(1)(a) and the unfair dismissal claim remained to be heard. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 38(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- Sovereign House Security Services Ltd v Savage
- Kwik-Fit (GB) Ltd v Lineham
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.