Case 6038011/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Adam Blanchard v Work with Vista Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6038011/2025
- Decision date
- 11 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Adam Blanchard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAdam Blanchard’s claim against Work with Vista Limited for unlawful deduction of wages in respect of commission succeeded. His claims for holiday pay and notice pay failed and were dismissed. Employment Judge Feeney heard the case at Manchester on 15 April and 1 July 2026. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment does not set out the factual findings or reasoning behind the individual outcomes.
The tribunal ordered Work with Vista Limited to pay £7,991.50 gross for the commission claim. The accompanying interest notice specifies a rate of 8% per annum and a calculation day of 30 July 2026. It states that no interest is payable if the award is paid in full within 14 days after the written decision was sent to the parties on 29 July 2026; otherwise, interest accrues from the calculation day. No calculated interest amount is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for commission. | Upheld | — | £7,992 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,992
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.