Case 6038075/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Lukas Rasimas v Dean Levoi — 2026
- Case reference
- 6038075/2025
- Decision date
- 10 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lukas Rasimas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded in Dean Levoi's absence under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. Lukas Rasimas gave evidence that he received a fixed monthly payment of £1,500 and had not been paid for August 2025, September 2025, or the two weeks ending 14 October 2025. The tribunal accepted that unchallenged evidence and upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim, awarding £3,750 in arrears of pay.
The separate claim for unpaid notice was not well founded. Mr Rasimas had given notice on 1 October 2025, and the tribunal found that any notice-pay entitlement was subsumed within the award of unpaid wages for October 2025, so no additional notice award was due.
The tribunal found that approximately six days of annual leave had accrued but remained untaken. Applying a daily rate of £69.23, calculated from monthly pay of £1,500, it awarded £415.38 in holiday pay. It also declared that the Respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements throughout the employment, but made no financial award for that complaint. Compensation for stress or inconvenience was not awarded because such losses were not recoverable in the claims before the tribunal. The total ordered was £4,165.38.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unpaid wages for August 2025, September 2025, and two weeks to 14 October 2025. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for a separate unpaid-notice award was not well founded because the notice period was subsumed within the arrears of pay for October 2025. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for approximately six days of accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £415 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the Respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements throughout the employment, but made no separate financial award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,165
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.