Case 6038425/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C McGibbon v 1) Transport for London 2) London Underground — 2026
- Case reference
- 6038425/2025
- Decision date
- 21 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Iman Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C McGibbon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found it had jurisdiction to consider the interim relief application because it was brought within seven calendar days immediately following the claimant's dismissal. The application concerned an automatically unfair dismissal claim based on alleged protected disclosures under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Applying the interim relief standard, the tribunal was not persuaded that the claimant had shown a pretty good chance of proving that she made protected disclosures, that she reasonably believed they were in the public interest and tended to show a statutory failure, or that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was the disclosures. The tribunal noted that the respondent had advanced material about an irretrievable breakdown in mutual trust and confidence and that relevant facts would need to be tested at a final hearing.
The tribunal dismissed the interim relief application after a summary assessment on limited documents and without oral evidence. It made clear that it was not determining the underlying claim and that dismissal of the application did not necessarily mean the claimant would be unsuccessful at a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismissed the claimant's application for interim relief in an automatically unfair dismissal claim said to arise from protected disclosures. The tribunal expressly stated it was not making findings of fact and that the final hearing may reach a different outcome. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 129 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996
- Taplin v C Shippam Ltd
- Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz
- Parsons v Airplus International Ltd
- Al Qasimi v Robinson
- Wollenberg v Global Gaming Ventures (Leeds) Ltd
- pretty good chance
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.