Case 6038516/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Olutayo Ayodele v Precise Care Solutions Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6038516/2025
- Decision date
- 8 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Representation
- Venue
- London East Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Olutayo Ayodele
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld Olutayo Ayodele's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that pension contributions totalling £335.01 for April, May and June 2025 had not been paid into his pension and that £2,386.75 net had been deducted in July 2025. It ordered Precise Care Solutions Ltd to pay £2,721.76 for the deductions and £250 for financial loss attributable to the late payment.
The notice-pay breach-of-contract complaint was upheld, with damages of £5,583.43. The Tribunal also upheld the complaint that between 30 September 2019 and 31 July 2025 the respondent refused to permit the claimant to exercise his right to paid annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998. It assessed £12,188 as just and equitable compensation under regulation 30(4). Alternatively, it found that the respondent had breached a May 2025 agreement to pay accrued holiday pay after paying £1,000 but leaving £12,188 outstanding; that contractual ruling concerned the same £12,188 rather than an additional award.
Under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,165 and ordered a further £500 for financial loss attributable to its non-payment. Counting the alternative holiday-pay award once, the separate sums ordered total £25,408.19.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprises £2,721.76 in net deductions and £250 for attributable financial loss. The extracted April 2025 pension-contribution figure is unclear, but the judgment expressly gives £335.01 as the April–June total. | Upheld | — | £2,972 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice pay. The operative award is £5,583.43, although the bracketed calculation printed in paragraph 6 does not arithmetically reproduce that figure. | Upheld | — | £5,583 |
| Holiday pay | Compensation under regulation 30(4) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The contractual ruling concerning the same holiday pay was an alternative basis and was not cumulative. | Upheld | — | £12,188 |
| Breach of contract | Alternative contractual basis for the same £12,188 holiday-pay award; this was not an additional cumulative award. | Upheld | — | £12,188 |
| Redundancy | The award comprises a £4,165 redundancy payment and £500 for attributable financial loss. | Upheld | — | £4,665 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,408
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 30(4) Working Time Regulations 1998 (just and equitable compensation)
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.