Case 6039871/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Newman-Peill v The Stone Trough Inn Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6039871/2025
- Decision date
- 8 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Newman-Peill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr D Newman-Peill's claims against The Stone Trough Inn Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages and failure to provide itemised pay statements were presented within the applicable time limits. It therefore held that it had jurisdiction to hear both complaints and did not strike them out.
The judgment did not determine the merits of either claim or record any monetary award. Both claims therefore have an outcome of "other" for this extraction, reflecting the jurisdictional decision rather than a final decision on liability.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined only that the claim was presented within the applicable time limit, that it had jurisdiction, and that the claim was not struck out; liability was not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements. The tribunal determined only that the claim was presented within the applicable time limit, that it had jurisdiction, and that the claim was not struck out; liability was not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.