Case 6041017/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Swain v The Coach House — 2026
- Case reference
- 6041017/2025
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Swain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Miss A Swain's complaint that The Coach House had failed to keep records pursuant to Regulation 9 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 because it lacked jurisdiction to determine that complaint. It also found that her complaint of failure to provide adequate daily rest pursuant to Regulation 10 was not well founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal found that Miss Swain's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The complaint of failure to keep records pursuant to Regulation 9 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The complaint of failure to provide adequate daily rest pursuant to Regulation 10 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.