Case 6041090/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Jessica Hood v Daishs Sandringham Hotel Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6041090/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jessica Hood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJessica Hood complained of unfair dismissal. The Tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint and found that Ms Hood had been employed by Daishs Sandringham Hotel LTD for less than two years.
The Tribunal found that Ms Hood was therefore not entitled to bring the proceedings. It also recorded that, despite being given an opportunity to do so, she had not provided an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. The unfair dismissal claim was accordingly struck out. No remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal proceedings under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 two-year service requirement
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.