Case 6041634/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6041634/2025
- Decision date
- 1 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Galpin's application for interim relief under s128 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The Tribunal made no order for reinstatement or re-engagement, but ordered under s130(1) that her contract with Ramsgate Care Limited remain in force. Pay, pension and contractual benefits remained payable from 3 November 2025 until the claim is finally determined, and her continuous employment was to continue, subject to variation or revocation of the order, agreement between the parties, or reinstatement or re-engagement.
The respondent was ordered to pay £15,082.93 by 30 June 2026 for salary arrears from 10 November 2025 to 1 June 2026, calculated as seven months' pay less one week already paid. It was also ordered to pay £2,228.16 monthly on its usual payroll dates from 1 June 2026 until the whistleblowing dismissal complaint is finally determined. The substantive whistleblowing dismissal complaint remained undetermined by this interim judgment, so no outcome on that complaint was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The application for interim relief under s128 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The substantive whistleblowing dismissal complaint remained to be finally determined. In addition to the fixed salary-arrears payment, the continuation order required monthly payments of £2,228.16. | Upheld | — | £15,083 |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s130(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.