Case 6042086/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs V Du Toit v Reachers Cars and Minibuses Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6042086/2025
- Decision date
- 14 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs V Du Toit
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Watford Employment Tribunal on 14 November 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Anstis determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, on the available material.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,872.00 gross. The judgment records a total payable of £2,872.00.
The judgment is brief and does not separately itemise a basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings, or interest; the single sum represents the entirety of the award addressed in the document.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. The judgment refers to unpaid holiday entitlement; the gov.uk listing categorised the case under Working Time Regulations, but the judgment's operative wording is holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,872 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,872
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.