Case 6042653/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Nanthana Phinitmontri v Ms Supaporn Colement trading as Hattip Thai Spa — 2026
- Case reference
- 6042653/2025
- Decision date
- 10 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nanthana Phinitmontri
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 August 2026, Employment Judge Shotter ordered Ms Supaporn Colement, trading as Hattip Thai Spa, to pay Nanthana Phinitmontri £2,258, less deductions for tax and National Insurance. The judgment records the payment order without identifying the claim type or giving findings or reasons on liability. It does not break the award down into components.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 18 August 2026. The accompanying interest notice specifies interest at 8% per annum, accruing from 19 August 2026 unless the sum is paid in full within 14 days after the judgment was sent. No quantified interest amount is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment orders payment but does not identify the claim type or expressly state a liability outcome. The £2,258 award is not allocated to an identified claim. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,258
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- Section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.