Case 6043018/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Linley v Friends of Hullabaloo Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6043018/2025
- Decision date
- 24 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Linley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Friends of Hullabaloo Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr E Linley’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him £1,800 gross in arrears of wages and £3,000 gross for 20 days of accrued but untaken holiday at the date his employment ended.
The tribunal also found that Mr Linley was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded him £1,200 gross in damages. The awards totalled £6,000. The respondent did not attend the hearing or enter an appearance; the judgment records that reasons were given orally and does not set out further findings or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for arrears of wages. | Upheld | — | £1,800 |
| Holiday pay | Gross award for 20 days of accrued but untaken holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Breach of contract | Gross damages for dismissal in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.