Case 6043779/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Johnson v Spiralis Energy Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6043779/2025
- Decision date
- 11 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Johnson presented the claim against Spiralis Energy Ltd in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 27 November 2025. The respondent submitted a response stating that no part of the claim was contested, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Ms Johnson’s wages. It ordered payment of £3,434.90 gross, representing the deductions, plus £23.73 compensation for financial loss attributable to them, making a total award of £3,458.63.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprises £3,434.90 gross for the deductions and £23.73 compensation for attributable financial loss. | Upheld | — | £3,459 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,459
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £24
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.