Case 6043871/2025 · Employment Tribunal
N Prytulskiy v Itaewon Korean Hub Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6043871/2025
- Decision date
- 17 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Prytulskiy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Employment Tribunal on 28 November 2025. The respondent filed a response on 6 January 2026 stating that no part of the claim was contested, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The complaint of wrongful dismissal in respect of notice pay succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant the statutory notice pay to which they were entitled under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and ordered the respondent to pay the unpaid notice pay of £217.75.
No award was made in relation to any separate complaint of unfair dismissal. The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not have two years' employment with the respondent, which is required to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Complaint of wrongful dismissal in respect of notice pay succeeded under section 86 ERA 1996; respondent did not contest the claim. | Upheld | — | £218 |
| Unfair dismissal | No award made; claimant did not have the two years' qualifying service required to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Listed under gov.uk categories as breach of contract; the judgment adjudicates the notice pay claim as wrongful dismissal under s.86 ERA 1996 rather than as a separate breach of contract claim, so no distinct breach of contract finding is recorded. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £218
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.