Case 6044082/2025 · Employment Tribunal
J Ng v Pitchflix Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6044082/2025
- Decision date
- 27 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Ng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 29 November 2025. The respondent indicated that it did not intend to defend the claim, and judgment was entered in favour of the claimant under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for August 2025 (£378.44 net), September 2025 (£2,003.44 net), October 2025 (£2,003.44 net) and November 2025 (£2,003.44 net). The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £6,388.76 net in total, and the hearing listed for 15 May 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 default judgment: respondent indicated it did not intend to defend. Award covers unauthorised deductions for August (£378.44), September (£2003.44), October (£2003.44) and November 2025 (£2003.44), totalling £6388.76 net. | Upheld | — | £6,389 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,389
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.