Case 6044258/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Lisa Perkins v SLX Group Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6044258/2025
- Decision date
- 20 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lisa Perkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningLisa Perkins's complaint of unfair dismissal against SLX Group Ltd was struck out. The tribunal applied section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
The claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment recorded that the claimant's other complaints were not affected; it did not identify or determine them, and it made no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment and were not identified or adjudicated in the supplied judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.