Case 6045287/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ambrosio v G4S Heard: Birmingham — 2026
- Case reference
- 6045287/2025
- Decision date
- 21 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Ambrosio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Ambrosio's claim for unfair dismissal was struck out because the Tribunal found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. Under s.108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant did not have the required two years of service.
The claimant was issued with a strike-out warning and invited to explain why the claim should not be struck out. Employment Judge Codd found that the reasons provided did not identify any basis on which the Tribunal had jurisdiction and instead focused on the impact of the dismissal. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment recorded that the claimant's remaining claims were unaffected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction under s.108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996: the claimant did not have two years of service. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims were unaffected by this decision. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.