Case 6045761/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Monika Moravcikova v Michelangelo (Worthing) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6045761/2025
- Decision date
- 25 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Monika Moravcikova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 10 December 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined.
The tribunal found that Monika Moravcikova was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,760 in damages. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,530.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £268.62. The total amount payable was £5,558.62.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,760 |
| Redundancy | The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,530 |
| Holiday pay | Award for the respondent's failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £269 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,559
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.