Case 6046360/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robbie Kumar v Shine’s Environmental — 2026
- Case reference
- 6046360/2025
- Decision date
- 1 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robbie Kumar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Robbie Kumar's complaint of unfair dismissal contrary to sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out. The tribunal found that he had been employed by Shine’s Environmental for less than two years and therefore did not satisfy the qualifying-service requirement in section 108 of the Act.
The claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not provide an acceptable reason. The judgment did not determine or affect his other complaints, including his complaint of discriminatory dismissal under the Equality Act, and recorded no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's other complaints, including discriminatory dismissal under the Equality Act, were not affected by this judgment and were not adjudicated in it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 94 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996 two-year qualifying-service requirement
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.