Case 8000001/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Danny Sullivan Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 8000001/2022
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland in case 8000001/2022, between Mr M Zelealem and Danny Sullivan Group Limited, struck out the claim by judgment dated 12 December 2022 and entered in the register on 14 December 2022. The tribunal did so under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The reasons state that on 28 November 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 5 December 2022, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not set out any merits findings or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action. The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) as not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.