Case 8000011/2026 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge d’Inverno Case Number: 8000011/2026 Mr R Hunter v Carnegie Estate Management Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000011/2026
- Decision date
- 19 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge d’Inverno Case Number: 8000011/2026 Mr R Hunter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge d’Inverno issued a judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that no response had been presented to the claim. The judge decided the matter on the available material.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,615.38. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £173.07.
The judgment was sent to parties on 19 February 2026. No further reasons, legal tests, or panel members are recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment issued under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 as no response was presented. Sum ordered is gross. | Upheld | — | £1,615 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement; sum ordered is gross. Judgment issued under rule 22 in absence of a response. | Upheld | — | £173 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,788
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.