Case 8000029/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000029/2024 Miss C Douglas v Represented by: BrewDog — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000029/2024
- Decision date
- 24 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000029/2024 Miss C Douglas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Miss C Douglas's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The reason given was non-compliance with Orders 1 and 2 and paragraph 5 of the tribunal's order issued on 13 March 2024, relying on rule 37(1)(c).
The reasons note that the orders were issued after a preliminary hearing attended by the claimant. Reminders to comply were sent on 3, 8 and 17 April 2024. On 29 April 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant until 13 May 2024 to provide written reasons why judgment should not be entered against her, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give any reason why strike out should not be made and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records that 'the claim' was struck out; the underlying claim type is not specified in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.