Case 8000039/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Boat Brae
An employment tribunal has upheld an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Boat Brae. The tribunal recorded a total award of £252.
- Case reference
- 8000039/2025
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I Mcfatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Gregory
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued on the available material because the respondent presented no response to the claim. Employment Judge I Mcfatridge decided the case without a hearing on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages from Miss R Gregory. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £252, described as calculated on the basis of 21 hours at £12 per hour.
The judgment also provided that the respondent could deduct any Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions required by law before paying the claimant, provided those sums were remitted to HMRC and written evidence of the deductions and remittance was supplied. Payment of the balance would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment. The respondent presented no response. The Employment Judge found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £252, calculated as 21 hours at £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £252 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £252
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.