Case 8000053/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8000053/2025 Miss S Sargenti v MMR (KIRKCALDY) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000053/2025
- Decision date
- 3 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8000053/2025 Miss S Sargenti
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 April 2025 the Tribunal asked the claimant to provide further information to allow a default judgment to be issued. The claimant replied on 4 May 2025 and said that the insolvency agency had contacted them about claiming their money back. The Tribunal then wrote on 12 May 2025 asking whether, in light of that correspondence, the claimant wished to withdraw the claim.
Two reminders were issued on 21 May 2025 and 30 May 2025, but no response was received. On 16 June 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 30 June 2025 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so Employment Judge Jones struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment did not record any substantive determination on the merits and did not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.